EINSTEIN'S HYPOTHESIS OF GENERAL RELATIVITY IS NOT VALID

Evidently, back ground of spacetime idea because he has no idea on the basic of astronomy; and not knowing that space and time has been applied in astronomy for long time ago.

Navigator Reveals The Fact

DID YOU KNOW?

EINSTEIN'S HYPOTHESIS OF GENERAL RELATIITY IS NOT VALID

CAN NOT BE PROVEN OR TESTED IN ANY WAY WHATSOEVER

Hypothesis and Einstein proposed test of general relativity are closely related to astronomy, especially celestial navigation. For understanding that hypothesis and the test are not valid, physics training is needed; but more importantly is celestial navigation training. Unfortunately, physicists and astrophysicists are not trained to become experts in the field of celestial navigation. The navigators around the world will be easily to recognize the fatal flaws of these hypotheses and test. Actually, general relativity can not be proven or tested in any way. No doubt, all tests that says ‘general relativity is correct’ really are the case of ‘knowing the result they wanted to get’.

41 Articles on Medium April, 2016 - August , 2017

1.I Need Not Prove My Claim, You Must Prove It Is False!-August 2017.

2.Einstein’s Thought Experiment Proves Special Relativity Is False

3.A Single Observation that Disagrees with the Prediction of General Relativity

4.The Field Equations of Gravitation (EFE) Violates the Basic of Astronomy

5.EEP: The Fallacy of  Composition.

6.How could a Small Warped Spacetime Orbits a Large Warped Spacetime?

7.Top 4 Reasons Why GPS Doesn’t Need Einstein's Relativity.

8.Why Should We Return to the Moon?

9.What Causes Mercury’s Orbit the Most Eccentric?

10.Gravitational Lensing: Forcing a Claim in Science

11.Logical Fallacies of Standard Model of Physics Over Decades.

12.Black Holes and Big Bang are the Old Stories.

13.Why Doesn’t the Earth Fall Towards the Sun?

14.Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrophysical Observations

15.Is It True that Newton’s Gravity is Not as Good as Einstein's Gravity?

16.An Important Thing Einstein Had Failed

17.Gravitational Waves vs Gravity Waves

18.What Happens If Gravity Probe B Succeeded Test General Relativity?

19.What Happens If the Force of Gravity Doesn't Exist?

20.Use Equivalence Principle And You’ll Look Like Einstein’s Happiest Thought

21.High School Students Easily Be Able to Understand Einstein’s Gravity Is False

22.Why Didn’t They Know Nonsense?

23.A Confirmation of General Relativity Won The Nobel Prize!

24.Eclipse’s Data of 1919 -1973 Verify Einstein’s Prediction Really Doesn't Work.

25.Experimental Evidence Predictions of General Relativity Don't Work

26.What Is The Most Accurate Telescope?

27.VLBI Measurements: Only One Can Be Right.

28.Gravity Probe B: Mission Impossible?

29.Why Didn’t They Know 3D+1D Space and Time?

30.Astronomical Data Prove Spacetime Fiction.

31.Logical Fallacies Of Einstein's Theory.

32.Prediction on the 2017 Eclipse Proves Einstein Was Wrong.

33.Einstein’s Proving Method Via Eclipse Is Not Scientifically Correct and Deeply Wrong.

34.What’s Wrong With Measuring The Speed of Gravity in 2002?

35.Albert Einstein Failed in Three Classical Tests

36.Sphere of Space and Time

37.What Exactly is Gravity?

38.Albert Einstein Began by Rejecting the Ether Theory.

39.Deflection of Light by Refraction, Not Gravity (Curve Geometry of Spacetime)

40.Albert Einstein’s Thought Experiment and Equivalence Principle are Misleading.

41.No doubt: Einstein’s General Theory Of Relativity Was Wrong-April, 2016.

Can the eclipse tell us if Einstein was right about general relativity?

Unfortunately, I have to answer honestly: No, that's impossible because Einstein's hypothesis is not valid.(sciencenews.org)

WHAT IS THE BIGGEST THING EINSTEIN WAS WRONG ABOUT?

Because Einstein had no idea on the basic of astronomy:

Published on 1916, Einstein predicts light from a distance star passing by the limb of the Sun would be deflected by 1.75  arc seconds.This prediction without any explanation the altitude of star/the Sun during eclipse. Therefore, this prediction has no scientific meaning, because calculation for deviation of star all depend on the altitude of star.

Something weird and magical when experimental tests of general relativity; via eclipse using optical telescopes (1919, 1922, 1927, 1936, 1952, 1973) and test using radio telescope after 2004, the result is declared general relativity is correct.

That is very embarrasing to the world of science. They are not aware of making themselves look so foolish: had no idea on the basic of astronomy.

READ MORE: On Quora

Youtube: Watch Video

THESE ARE NOT PHOTOS OF BLACK HOLES

SCIENTISTS HAVE PEERED INTO A BLACK HOLE AND TAKEN A PHOTO OF ITS EVENT HORIZON FOR THE VERY FIRST TIME. From the initial image returned, scientists should be able to test relativity. “If you know the mass of the black hole—and for Sagittarius A* we know that well—and if you know the distance of the black hole, which again we know well, then relativity predicts you will see that shadow and ring and that the ring will have a certain diameter and it will be near circular. That’s a test of relativity. If the shape isn’t circular or the wrong size, then relativity has made a prediction that has failed. That’s the first thing we’ll look at.” (Event Horizon Telescope)

Event horizon telescope will be useless; the same as radio telescope (VLBI), LIGO's twin detector and other. Einstein’s gravity (general relativity) was totally wrong (Astronomical Data Prove Spacetime Fiction)

Eclipse’s Data of 1919 -1973 Verify Einstein’s Prediction Really Doesn’t Work

TEST OF GENERAL RELATIVITY AT 2017 ECLIPSE USING ASTRONOMICAL METHOD

TEST OF GENERAL RELATIVITY 

AT 2017 SOLAR ECLIPSE

“…during totality on August 21, 2017 — although it will be close to midday — you’ll easily be able to see 4 planets with the unaided eye near the eclipsed sun!

In order of brightness, these planets will be Venus, Jupiter, Mars and Mercury. Mars is slightly brighter than Mercury, but so nearly the same in brightness that you probably won’t notice a difference.”( Eddie Irizarry, See 4 planets during 2017 solar eclipse, earthsky.org).

    At the 2017 solar eclipse, Monday, August 21, in USA, the bright star Regulus make a thrilling sight shinning near the Sun’s corona, this event is the best chance to test or re-examine Einstein’s general theory of relativity.

    As we know, at his theory of general relativity, Einstein declared a new law on gravity, stating that gravity was not a force as commonly known at the Newton’s gravity theory, but a part of inertia. His gravity law illustrated the object behaviour at the gravity field, for instance the planets, not in the sense of ‘the attracting forcer’ but only in the sense of the crossing track being taken.

    For Einstein, gravity is a part of inertia. The movement of stars and planets originates from their inertia derivation, and the crossing track taken is determined by the space metrical nature, or more precisely the continuous space-time.

    Einstein concluded that the light just as other material objects, moved in curve if gravity field of an object was massive. Einstein suggested that his hypothesis could be tested to observe the crossing track of the star light at gravity field of the sun. Due to the fact that the stars are not visible at day time, there is only one chance when the sun and the stars can be seen together at the sky, and that is the time when there is a solar eclipse.

    Special phenomena of 2017 solar eclipse, that we will easily be able to see 4 planets, and the bright star Regulus make a thrilling sight shinning near the Sun’s corona.

    Apparent position of the star Regulus during total solar eclipse meet the conditions in accordance with Einstein hypothesis

     According to Einstein’s hypothesis, the star light visible around the sun would be bent inwards, toward the sun at the time when passing through the gravity field of the sun. Einstein calculated the level of their deviation and predicted that for the stars observed being the closest to the Sun, their deviation was about 1.75 seconds of an arc.

Test of general relativity

     In this test, we use terminology  "deflection of light by the Sun" as Einstein's idea on general relativity, and Einstein proposed test via eclipse. In this book, "tests" is made by using astronomical data that has been predicted at the 2017 total solar eclipse, in USA, August 21.

As explained in previous discussion, there are three steps to test general relativity using astronomical method: determine the place of observation, measuring the apparent altitude of star  using the sextant, and apply data to find  the deviation of starlight  in the Nautical Almanac.of 2017.

    To get the most accurate results, the test should be carried out at the locations of a total eclipse, in this case in the USA, on August 21, 2017 .   

    According to Earthsky Website, any location along the path of totality from Oregon to South Carolina can enjoy good weather on eclipse day, but the western half of the United States, especially from the Willamette Valley of Oregon to the Nebraska Sandhills, will enjoy the very best weather odds. Therefore, the best place of direct observation to test general relativity is in Oregon, sea waters near the Oregon coast or on the beach of Madras.

    In this case, the measurement using a sextant. The sextant allows us to very accurately measure the apparent altitude of stars, it’s because there are  visible horizon from the sea or beach.  According to Earthsky Website, totality begins at 10:19 a.m, and duration of totality is 2 minutes, 4 seconds.

Prediction at 2017 total solar eclipse.

   In this book,  prediction is made based on astronomical data from NASA Eclipse Website, the Astroadventure Website, and Earthsky Website.

Read more in Your Kindle Device:

Kindle eBook-Amazon.Co.UK

    Einstein’s prediction or according to general relativity, the deviation of Regulus, as the star observed being the closest to the Sun,  was about 1,75 sec. arc.  But we get results as prediction at 2017 eclipse is about 236 sec.arc. It is more than 100 times greater than Einstein’s prediction. 

Read more in Medium: 

Astronomical Data Prove Spacetime Fiction

LOGICAL FALLACIES OF EINSTEIN'S THEORY

Einstein has no competence in the field of Astronomy.

    The main source of this book is the book ‘ The Universe and Dr. Einstein’, by Lincoln Barnett, London, 1949, Foreword by Albert Einstein himself. Some reviews about this book:

    “This is a brilliant, readable and clear report, by a gifted journalist, of the significance of Einstein’s theories and their far reaching effect upon the modern world. Written for laymen, it penetrates the realms of space, explains the facts available on the nature of atoms, and merges for purposes of clarity, the relation between philosophy and modern science.Utilizing the theories of Newton, Planck, Gamow, Lemaitre and Jeans, Barnett explains the Einstein concept of the universe. Relating these scientific theories to the philosophical systems existing at the time, he shows how all forms of human activity are influenced by the discoveries of science, and how Einstein’s theories are a step in this long history of research.”

   
     “Everybody who has a mind, or who imagines he is a thinker, should understand this much of Relativity as a minimum.”—Philip Wylie
   
     “The Universe and Dr. Einstein sets a new standard in science writing and is, I think, the first American book that can be compared in maturity, clarity, and grace with the distinguished and influential works of Sir James Jeans and Sir Arthur Eddington.”—Gerald Wendt, N. Y. Herald Tribune Book Review
 (Pickle Partners Publishing on Aug 9, 2016)
    
    I agree with everything the above review says. In my opinion, the book The Universe and Dr.Einstein  is very interesting. This book shows that the author, Lincoln Barnett, really  is an expert in conveying his ideas, I mean, the ideas of Albert Einstein relates with his two popular theory, special  and general theory of relativity. Reading this book, as if I am dealing with Albert Einstein himself, who was telling the background of the invention of his theories. 
    
    I assumed that the author of this book has conducted an interview with Albert Einstein himself, or at least has been made an intense of communication with Einstein.
    Albert Einstein himself wrote a foreword, and among other he states:
"Lincoln Barnett's book represents a valuable contribution to popular scientific writing. The main ideas of the theory of relativity are extremely well-presented. Moreover, the present state of our knowledge to physics is aptly characterized.

     The author shows how the growth of our factual knowledge, together with the striving for a unified theoritical conception comprising all empirical data, has led to the present situation which is characterized-notwithstanding all successes-by uncertainty concerning the choice of the basics theoritcal concepts"

    Lincoln Barnett's book has a very important meaning for me, because I’ve  found a kind of valid proof about Einstein's theory, which it has not been revealed by others. I’ve found some of logical fallacies of Einstein ideas in the Lincoln Barnett’s book, relating with Einstein’s theory, special and general theory of relativity.

    What is logical fallacies?  Fallacies are defects that weaken arguments; Logical fallacies are errors in reasoning that invalidate the argument.

    
    A fallacy is an incorrect argument in logic and rhetoric which undermines an argument's logical validity or more generally an argument's logical soundness. Fallacies are either formal fallacies or informal fallacies.These are commonly used styles of argument in convincing people, where the focus is on communication and results rather than the correctness of the logic, and may be used whether the point being advanced is correct or not.

    Of course, some errors in reasoning of Einstein,  as the founder of theories, make a great impact to the validity of the two theories: Special and General theory of Relativity.

New release paperback-Amazon

5.Conclusion:

List Of Einstein’s Logical Fallacies

There are at least 5 logical fallacies of Einstein's special and general theory of relativity

1.Einstein’s Thought Experiment: Fallacy Of Composition.

2.The Equivalence Principle: A false equivalence

3.Spacetime: A fallacy of ambiguity or reification.

4.Einstein's Field Equation: Logical fallacy : argumentum ad lapidem

5.Einstein's proving method: The fallacy of ignoratio elenchi, or irrelevant conclusion.

Einstein had no idea of the units and disciplines of measurement as the goal of using mathematics in physics. EFE just a formal mathematical construct with no real physical meaning.

In the book The Universe and Dr.Einstein, by Lincoln Barnett, on page 78, we can read Einstein proposed test for his theory as evidence that Einstein had no idea on the basic of astronomy. Einstein proposed test of general relativity is not scientifically correct and deeply wrong.

Correct illustration should be : the rays are bent down, with the result that image or apparent of star looks higher than it actual of star.

    

Moreover, as he had written a foreword, he had not realized there is incorrect illustration on page 79, and it shows he does not understand about the effects of deviation of starlight in the real world, for example, when we see the stars in the sky at night. Einstein has no competence in the field of astronomy.

There is no such thing as spacetime or a curve space in the real world.

Second Edition:

There are at least 5 logical fallacies of Einstein's special and general theory of relativity, and this book reveals evidence and reasoning that general relativity doesn't meet the principles of scientific method. 

This book try to convey prediction using astronomical test of general relativity at 2017 total solar eclipse, in USA, August 21. This book also shows that astronomical data of 2017 eclipse prove spacetime is false.

                                                   A Beautiful Sunset - @julia_zba

WHY EINSTEIN NEVER RECEIVED A NOBEL PRIZE FOR RELATIVITY

Einstein's Proving Method via Eclipse is NOT SCIENTIFIC and DEEPLY WRONG

Nobel prizes often attract controversy, but usually after they have been awarded. Albert Einstein's physics prize was the subject of argument for years before it was even a reality.

PROF.LAURA MERSINI: BLACK HOLES DO NOT EXIST AND BIG BANG WRONG

Black holes do NOT exist and the Big Bang Theory is wrong, claims scientist - and she has the maths to prove it.

A scientist from University of North Carolina states she has mathematical proof that black holes (illustrated) can't exist. She said it is impossible for stars to collapse and form a singularity. Previously, scientists thought stars larger than the sun collapsed under their own gravity and formed black holes as they died.

The research was conducted by Professor Laura Mersini-Houghton from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the College of Arts and Scientists.

Scientist claims she has mathematical proof black holes cannot exist