PROF.LAURA MERSINI: BLACK HOLES DO NOT EXIST AND BIG BANG WRONG

Black holes do NOT exist and the Big Bang Theory is wrong, claims scientist - and she has the maths to prove it.

A scientist from University of North Carolina states she has mathematical proof that black holes (illustrated) can't exist. She said it is impossible for stars to collapse and form a singularity. Previously, scientists thought stars larger than the sun collapsed under their own gravity and formed black holes as they died.

The research was conducted by Professor Laura Mersini-Houghton from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the College of Arts and Scientists.

Scientist claims she has mathematical proof black holes cannot exist

GENERAL RELATIVITY HAS BEEN WRONG SINCE THE BEGINNING

Einstein’s prediction of light deflection could not be tested immediately in 1915, because the First World War was in progress, and it was not until 1919 that a British expedition, observing an eclipse from West Africa, showed that light was indeed deflected by the sun, just as predicted by the theory. This proof of a German theory by British scientists was hailed as a great act of reconciliation between the two countries after the war. It is ionic, therefore, that later examination of the photographs taken on that expedition showed the errors were as great as the effect they were trying to measure. Their measurement had been sheer luck, or a case of knowing the result they wanted to get, not an uncommon occurrence in science. (Stephen Hawking, A Brief History of Time)

Tests on the general relativity theory as suggested by Albert Einstein: the photo taken to the stars at the time when the sun was dark during the solar eclipse was compared to the photo of the same stars taken at another time. The words ‘was compared to the photo of the same stars taken at another time’ means proposal suggested by Albert Einstein is unjustifiable from scientific point of view of the astronomy.
It is really hard to understand that the tests was conducted by a team led by Arthur Eddington in 1919.

Here we know general relativity was wrong. Einstein ignored light refraction: astronomical refraction and terrestrial refraction, when he proposed the proving method for general relativity, and at the same time ignored the existing of the celestial sphere.  Each point in the earth has its own celestial sphere. The celestial sphere is only applicable at a certain time and at a certain place on which such observation is performed.

GENERAL RELATIVITY IS WRONG

New Release

“Einstein’s prediction of light deflection could not be tested immediately in 1915, because the First World War was in progress, and it was not until 1919 that a British expedition, observing an eclipse from West Africa, showed that light was indeed deflected by the sun, just as predicted by the theory. This proof of a German theory by British scientists was hailed as a great act of reconciliation between the two countries after the war. It is ionic, therefore, that later examination of the photographs taken on that expedition showed the errors were as great as the effect they were trying to measure. Their measurement had been sheer luck, or a case of knowing the result they wanted to get, not an uncommon occurrence in science. “ ( Stephen Hawking, A Brief History of Time, 1985 ).

The tests of General Relativity as suggested by Einstein : the photo taken to the stars at the time when the sun was dark during the solar eclipse was compared to the photo of the same stars taken “at another time’. The words ‘at another time’ means proposal suggested by Einstein is not at all scientific, the reasons are explained by the following pictures.

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 1 is two stars portrait taken by an observer from point A in the earth at a time, and Figure 2 is the same portrait of two star, taken by the same observer from point B in the earth ‘at another time‘ eg two months later. Point A located in Europe, while the point B located in the Africa continent, the two point  has a big different of the latitude and longitude.

    The two sightings of  stars will always be different because point A and B has its own Celestial Sphere. The Celestial Sphere is only applicable at a certain time and at a certain place on which such observation is performed. Therefore, the two portraits can not be compared.

    And again ..... the two portraits is the appearance of Apparent Position of the two stars, not the the True Position. Therefore,  from the two portraits could not be use to calculate the angular difference between True Position and Apparent Position of stars that becomes the object of observation.

Conclusions: The tests / proving method on the theory on general relativity as requested by its founder, Albert Einstein, is unjustifiable from scientific point of view of the astronomy. In addition, a hypothesis stating that the light is bent by gravity of massive object ignores the existence of light refraction (Snell’s Law). 

   If a scientist conveys a theory and at the same time shows its proving method, however after being tested by another scientist it is found out that his proposed proving method is proven to be unable to be performed due to not being scientific, then automatically such proposed theory prematurely falls by itself. And the proving cannot be  carried out by other methods not  as requested by the theory founder, since it is reasonably assumed that such proving is made based on belief.

    The general relativity theory has been wrong since the beginning. True, general relativity theory is wrong.

One More Night

"One More Night"

You and I go hard at each other like we're going to war.
You and I go rough, we keep throwing things and slamming the door.
You and I get so damn dysfunctional, we stopped keeping score.
You and I get sick, yeah, I know that we can't do this no more.

Yeah, but baby there you go again, there you go again, making me love you.
Yeah, I stopped using my head, using my head, let it all go.
Got you stuck on my body, on my body, like a tattoo.
And now I'm feeling stupid, feeling stupid, crawling back to you.

So I cross my heart and I hope to die
That I'll only stay with you one more night
And I know I said it a million times
But I'll only stay with you one more night

Try to tell you "no" but my body keeps on telling you "yes".
Try to tell you "stop", but your lipstick got me so out of breath.
I'll be waking up in the morning, probably hating myself.
And I'll be waking up, feeling satisfied but guilty as hell.

Yeah, but baby there you go again, there you go again, making me love you.
(Making me love you)
Yeah, I stopped using my head, using my head, let it all go.
(I let it all go)
Got you stuck on my body, on my body, like a tattoo.
(Like a tattoo, yeah)
And now I'm feeling stupid, feeling stupid, crawling back to you.

So I cross my heart and I hope to die
(Yeah)
That I'll only stay with you one more night
(Oh)
And I know I said it a million times
(Yeah)
But I'll only stay with you one more night
(Yeah)

Yeah, baby, give me one more night
Yeah, baby, give me one more night (whoa, yeah)
Yeah, baby, give me one more night (oh, yeah, yeah)

Yeah, but baby there you go again, there you go again making me love you.
Yeah, I stopped using my head, using my head, let it all go.
Got you stuck on my body, on my body like a tattoo.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah

So I cross my heart and I hope to die
(Oh oh oh oh, oh oh oh oh)
That I'll only stay with you one more night
(Oh oh oh oh oh oh)
And I know I said it a million times
(Oh, I said it a million times)
But I'll only stay with you one more night
(Yeah, baby give me one more night)

So I cross my heart and I hope to die (yeah, yeah)
That I'll only stay with you one more night (yeah, yeah)
And I know I said it a million times (yeah, yeah)
But I'll only stay with you one more night (yeah, yeah)

I don't know, whatever.

CreateSpace Store - Updated August 25/2015 

Buy Gatot Soedarto's Books Direct  on CreateSpace Store

CLAIMS SCIENTIST: BLACK HOLES DO NOT EXIST AND THE BIG BANG THEORY IS WRONG

       

          Scientist claims she has mathematical proof black holes cannot exist

         She said it is impossible for stars to collapse and form a singularity

Professor Laura Mersini-Houghton said she is still in 'shock' from the find    Previously, scientists thought stars much larger than the sun collapsed under their own gravity and formed black holes when they died  During this process they release a type of radiation called Hawking radiation

But new research claims the star would lose too much mass and wouldn't be able to form a black hole       If true, the theory that the universe began as a singularity, followed by the Big Bang, could also be wrong